Domestic violence is funny when it happens to men. Fortunately there’s a shelter nowhere he can go. Feminists everywhere can rejoice that there’s one man who “understands” the impact of domestic violence.
As his girlfriend went after his face with garden shears he was very proud that he never once hit her back.
Else he wouldn’t be able to call the police. And we both know why.
can anyone tell me who the girl on the right is?
Kelly Brook I believe.
This is so terrifying oh my god please tell me he’s gotten help please.
First off, OHMYGOd what kind of sick, twisted, person would do this? I am truly disgusted.
That being said, I haaaaaaaaate the stupid ass dichotomy of the OP for so many reasons. Yes, our justice system is much less hard on female abusers. Yes, that’s horrible and we need to fix it. Yes, I am outraged that this poor man and others like him will probably never recieve the justice they deserve.
BUT, I understand why the sytem has become that way. ANd it sure as FUCK isn’t because a bunch of innocent guys were unjustly accused of crimes against women.
As a woman, I shouldn’t have to grow up feeling relieved that I am “ugly” because at least that way I will never be raped. I shouldn’t have to be afriad to be alone with a man I don’t even know. I shouldn’t have to threaten every single one of my girl friends’ boyfriends for fear that one day she will tell me that “it was just her being clumsy” again.
And we have to have to fix thsese things NOW. NOW, NOt LATER. And people like you crying “oh no, the system is inherently fucked up, look how horrible feminism is” aren’t helping anything.
Because you can scream that feminists are oppressive all you want, but you can never fix the damage that sexism against women does EVERY SINGLE DAY by ignoring it. You can’t take away my eating disorder by telling me that others are suffering, too. You can’t take away the horror of a girl I know, molestedby TWO DIFFERENT MEN before the age of 6. And you sure as fuck cannot change the fact that the first guy I ever kissed thought it was cool to demand a handjob after our first kiss and grab my wrist when I said no.
And one more thing. I think you might be the one with a problem. Because you wanna know what I thought when I saw Ray Rice’s video? “What a horrible person, being so violent to his girlfriend.” And what I thought when I saw this one? “OHMYGOD THIS WOMAN SHOULD BE LOCKED UP IMMEDIATELY”.
So no, domestic violencce shouldn’t be gender specific. But right now, we need to change the fact that it is a norm for women. And we need everyone’s help for that, asshole, including you.
So go on, spread awareness of domestic violence against men. But please do it in a way that isn’t belittling of feminism.
Me: Man’s Face gets carved up by Garden Shears…
Feminist: BUT WHAT ABOUT THE WOMEN?!?!?!?
Me: But I’m literally talking about how this mans face was cut up with fucking garden shears and he has no pla…
Feminist: BUT WHAT ABOUT THE FUCKING WOMEN YOU MSIOGNEIST FUKINGZ SHITLORDZ AZSHOLE!!!!
Me: Are you shitting me?
Feminism: THE FEMINISMZ WILL NOT BE QUESTIONED. MEN DID IT… MEN FUCKING DID IT. IT’S THE MENZ!!! WHAT ABOUT THE FUCKING WOMEN?!q?!?!?ONEELVENONEONEELEVEN!!!11!!!!
Me: So, in the event you were wondering why I’m Anti-Feminist… actual videotape of a man with a face cut up with fucking garden shears isn’t reason enough for them to *not* make this about the women.
OMFG. I just looked up that Kelly Brook chick. She defended punching two ex boyfriends in the face by saying she got a fiery passion from her parents. That isnt passion. That is abuse.
Okay I see what people mean by the feminism and yes domestic violence can swing both ways but ya know what? It’s not as often, and not as hard. We need feminists in the world because tho women can be crazy and violent,so can men! Sure it seems a bit uneven but do you realize how it is to be in a world where everything you do u have to double check to “be safe around the other gender” to be blamed for a perv staring cuz your wearing a sundress, to be worried about walking home and your parents being paranoid to because it’s not safe. To see woman after woman be too weak to stop the domestic violence around them. Some victims are guys yes, but at least they can better defend themselves, get me away from a weapon or object around a dude and I’m screwed because I’m typically not as strong as a dude. I can guarantee if I ((or any of my girl friends)) where to hit a guy the most that would happen is a red mark and maybe a small bruise, but If a guy where to hit me I would probably either fly, hit the ground, bleed or pop something. I hate constantly having to live in a world of being put down, paid less, given stereotypes, and in paranoia and fear of being raped or molested or taken. So to those who oppress feminists, why don’t you stop and think for a moment: you won’t step down from your pedestal so we try to pass it to make up for what your not giving us. Equality. If you can’t agree then deal with it.
I’m so sorry about this dude, I hope he is okay. It’s a terrible thing and they should crack down on stuff like this.
I love how he had pride he didn’t touch her. He dealt with his problem like a real man. I respect that.
That woman needs help from a psychologist.
I hope the dude is better.
Christ, nothing can just be about helping men can it?
"I guarantee that if I hit a guy, the worst that could happen are bruses"
She says after watching video about a guy that’s been cut in the face with garden sheers by his ex girlfriend.
"Im afraid of being put into stereotypes" she says after stereotyping men as these muscle-gods with Hercules-like strength that are immune to anything
"feminists want equality!"
then why don’t you make it your goal to have male victims get the same amount of help as female victims get instead of making every conversation about women.
look at all this feminist bullshit.
And the worst part is, that I just FUCKING KNEW THIS WOULD HAPPEN. Here we have an excellent chance to debunk the bullshit idea that women on male abuse is somehow less bad than the reverse, but yet and still feminists are continuing to jump in and twist this issue into misogyny, erasing the very victim in this video to TALK ABOUT HOW WOMEN HAVE IT WORSE.
WHAT IN THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU FUCKING PEOPLE
And they wonder why feminism is a dirty word in most parts of society and 80% of the population wants nothing to do with it.
According to a study. White people are the least racist whilst PoCs are the most racist.
This is not a good thing.
Non-whites don’t give one miserable fuck about being racist. They shrug it off. It glides off them. Tolerance is not demanded from them. Only the white person cowers and shrinks when called racist. Only the white race cares enough to respond to the slander that is racism.
Again - Non-whites don’t care about being racist. At all. At best they’re indifferent and at worst they’ll laugh in your face and tell you that they’re incapable of being racist due to reasons that defy logic. They benefit from being intolerant and we would as well but such is taboo for us.
European and anglosphere countries are sadly at the point where they will apologize and bend over for anyone as soon as they accuse them of racism.
It’s almost as if you have to judge someone not by the color of the skin, but the content of their character.
Now what groundbreaking civil rights leader said that? Oh yeah! MLK.
Here’s the speech:
Watch and be educated
4CHAN HAS FALLEN. I REPEAT: 4CHAN HAS FALLEN. As you read this, a rogue “SJW” mod is banning IPs on /v/ for posts related to the #GamerGate scandal on the grounds of “misogyny.” That’s right, because all the racism, anti-semitism, porn, and gore is fine. But don’t you dare talk bad about a woman like Zoe Quinn! These supposed “Social Justice Warriors” are attempting to do this on multiple other sites, including reddit.
Why, you may ask? Because this supposed “Social Justice” movement isn’t about justice at all. Or racism, or sexism, or homophobia, transphobia, or any other prejudice. No, it’s about a bunch of whiny little assholes with a persecution complex who want to be special snowflakes all the time, and will censor anyone who calls the out on their shit. The political correctness freaks who get all wound up when Douchebag Larry uses the N-word. They can’t handle the way the world is, so they go online and try to censor everything. Make their own perfect little world where they can make up bullshit genders and pronouns and cry “prejudice” when someone tells them how stupid they are. When someone like Zoe Quinn sleeps with journalists to push her own shitty game, or someone like Anita Sarkeesian makes up bullshit to convince the world every video game/gamer are “misogynistic,” calling them out is not misogyny, it’s the truth.
But this isn’t about video games anymore. It’s about censorship. We’re at war with the enemies of free speech. Those who think they can take our favorite websites away from us because they don’t like our attitude.
“The free communication of thoughts and opinions is is one of the most precious rights of man; any citizen thus may speak, write, print freely, except to respond to the abuse of this liberty, in cases deyermined by the law.”
-Decalaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen
“Every man has the right to utter what he thinks is truth, and every other man has the right to knock him down for it.”
But they’ve got one problem: They just unleashed the horde. Now that they took 4chan, where do they think they’ll all go? Simple. They’ll spam, they’ll raid, and they’ll troll everywhere SJWs hide. They’ll show them, one shitpost at a time, that ideas cannot be IP banned. Welcome to the end of Social Justice, ladies and gentlemen. It’s been a shitty, shitty ride. And to any SJWs that will undoubtedly see this post:
Are you triggered?
There is no reason to treat this as a tragedy, no matter how fondly I recall my Anon days. 4chan’s userbase isn’t composed of the kinda people who’d take this lying down. SJWs just tore the lid clear off of Pandora’s Box, and now woe shall betide them. And it’s going to be glorious.
230 african girls kidnapped by muslims:
All over the news, #Bringbackourgirls tweets by feminists and even the first lady.
1,400 white girls raped, tortured and sold into prostitution by muslims:
Barely makes it out of British press. Actively covered up by officials. Feminists don’t care.
at this point white people deserve everything that happens to them, yes rape is worse than murder in my opinion (because they have to live with it forever) but us white people have raped and pillaged and shot and bombed just about every race and nationality in history
Exactly how many of those 1400 girls do you think committed rape? Or murder? Or torture? Exactly how many of them do you think committed any crime whatsoever, other than the “crime” of being born white?
And I can’t help but wonder… if it were you… if you, personally, were dragged out of the safety of your home to be used as a sex slave for every goddamn day for the remainder of your pitiful life, would you still be mouthing “it’s OK, I’m white, I deserve this” as these state-endorsed (for what else can you call it when they actively cover their asses?) criminals violate you till you break? Somehow, I don’t think so…
what makes it art is all the cops staring like “yeah i’m not helping him up”
"Some people deserve to be physically assaulted for things they say" said the Nazi.
And the Social Justice Warrior agreed.
But I repeat myself.
oh my GOD YOU IGNORANT SLICE OF ASSHOLE PIE
PEOPLE OF COLOR GET PHYSICALLY ASSAULTED FOR THINGS THEY SAY AND DO (WAY LESS OFFENSIVE THINGS THEN USING A HORRIBLE RACIAL SLUR, BY THE WAY) ALL THE FUCKING TIME
r u fucken kiddin me bro
And that’s exactly why you’re a hypocritical piece of shit. To elaborate:
The question is, is one justified to hit another for something they say? If yes, this guy deserved it, but so did the “people of color” you’re referring to. If not, they didn’t deserve it, but neither did this guy. You can’t have your cake and eat it too.
"b-b-b-but its not scientific! we just need to be more tolerant!"
More surprised BBC ran the poll accurately. Figured they would take a page from HLN’s handbook on lying about polls.
UK being destroyed by diversity, multiculturalism and political correctness
Enjoy your diversity, multiculturalism, and self segregation lmao
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
What is Ruin Jam?
Ruin Jam is a game jam celebrating the nonexistent demise of video games, inspired by a lot of current events and a certain blog post. It’s open to anyone and everyone who has been, is being, or plans to be accused of ruining the games industry. All Ruiners are welcome to contribute to the death of video games, provided that they adhere to the spirit of the jam.
What’s Ruining Video Games?
Thanks for asking! So far as I can tell, the following items are among the things ruining video games:
- "Forced Diversity", i.e. Minority characters with agency.
- People who make or talk about games having social and/or love lives
- "SJWs", which stands "Social Justice Warriors". It’s bad to be this for some reason.
- People calling things that aren’t games games. The criteria for what a game is has yet to be disclosed.
- Not being able to jump, shoot, or be killed
- Criticism or satire of existing game franchises
One way or another, this is going to be hilarious, and I’m pretty damn sure I know which way. But I’m nothing if not fair, and I’m honestly curious whether anyone siding with the SJ mind-rot is capable of putting together a halfway decent game, so I’m contemplating testing and reviewing the submissions. If they’re lucky, they won’t even have to whore themselves out for a good review like a certain dev they’re defending *cough*zoequinn*cough* had to!
British Social Justice Warriors attempt to destroy woman who discovers most sexual abuse is done by "PoC">
The Home Office researcher was told to “never, ever” repeat evidence, contained in her 2001 report, that most of the perpatrators were Asian men
Take from this what you will.
Said it before, will say it again: destroy the notion of political correctness.
jackfrostish asks: "no there is no gray zone between feminism and misogyny you believe women are people or you don't"
Most bigoted sentence of the day goes to:
Nazism, the belief that whites are people.
The black panther party, the belief that blacks are people.
The westboro church, the belief that Christians are people.
I can fucking play this game too.Where’sfallacyalertwhen you need them?
The asker gives a perfect example of the black and white fallacy, and durkin62 responds with false analogy and Godwin’s Law. As crazy as 3rd-wave feminism can get, you should still think twice before comparing it to Nazis.
Lets make some comparisons shall we?
- discriminated against individuals on the basis of their genetic code
- promoted the view that the targeted group was inferior genetically and behaviourally
- promoted propaganda that led to the targeted group being labelled as ‘parasites’
- promoted propaganda that led to the targeted group being constantly ridiculed
- promoted propaganda that led to the targeted group being laughed at even when mutilated
- demonised the target group by labelling them as perverts and sexual criminals
- sought to break the target group away from their families
- promoted the view that the targeted group was responsible for most of the major ills in society
- disseminated lies and disinformation about the targeted group in order to further promote their own ideology
- disseminated lies and disinformation about historical matters
- used intimidation, threats and coercion to prevent their opponents from speaking out
- promoted the lie that the privileged group consisted of innocent ‘victims’ of the targeted group
- demanded special privileges in the workplace for members of the privileged group e.g. preferential job placements for women
- discriminated against the targeted group in educational matters and in the workplace
- perverted the justice system so that members of the targeted group were easily discriminated against in the law e.g. in family courts
- arranged matters so that accusers from the privileged group could be shielded by anonymity in the courtroom e.g. in sex-assault cases.
- arranged matters so that defendants from the targeted group had to ‘prove’ their innocence e.g. in sex-assault and domestic violence cases
- arranged matters so that members of the privileged group could capriciously define what, legally, was to be deemed ‘a crime’, e.g. where nowadays the ‘feelings’ of women rather than the behaviours of men are the determinants of what constitutes ‘a crime’
- arranged matters so that members of the privileged group could capriciously define how the law was to view certain matters e.g. a fetus inside a woman can now be deemed by her - at her whim - to be a worthless piece of tissue or a prospective baby - with all the ramifications of this - regardless of how the father might feel about it all (also sexual harassment, etc.)
- arranged matters so that the law punished members of the targeted group more severely than members of the privileged group for the very same crime e.g. in domestic violence and murder cases.
- arranged matters so that members of the targeted group were made responsible for the choices and behaviours of members of the privileged group e.g. in paternity fraud cases where duped fathers still have to pay child support
- arranged matters so that members of the privileged group who harmed, or even murdered, members of the targeted group were shown undue leniency - and were often actually applauded for their actions
- arranged matters so that the law punished members of the targeted group severely for even trivial offences, e.g. domestic violence, sexual harassment
- arranged matters so that members of the privileged group earned a right to the property of members of the targeted group for no other reason than that they were members of the privileged group e.g. alimony, child custody.
- arranged matters so that certain speech or attitudes directed against the privileged group were criminalised e.g. biased ‘hate speech’ laws.
- punished those who protested against the prevailing ideology; e.g. for being politically-incorrect.
- effectively controlled the mainstream media and the academic institutions and arranged for them to present a dishonest and dishonourable point of view in support of their ideology
- consistently highlighted and exaggerated the achievements and the suffering of the privileged group while downplaying the achievements and the suffering of the targeted group
- ran government-funded educational courses in universities (e.g. Women’s Studies, Title IX) and in schools to promote the privileged group at the expense of the targeted group.
- persisted in a long term campaign of hatred toward the targeted group, e.g. “A women needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle.” “Men think about sex every 15 seconds.”
But you know what? None of that even matters, because the entire point of my fucking statement was that you don’t get to claim that just because a group is supposedly working for the benefit of a certain demographic, being against the group is against the demographic. So yes, in fucking fact my comparison between those two groups is in fact accurate, so you can take your false false analogy and cram it right back up your ass.
Huh. This might be the first time I’ve ever seen someone react this civilly to a rebuttal. I commend you on your intellectual integrity, fallacyalert.