The Converted Invader v3.0

Back with vengeance.

Help me out?

Or pick up some anti-feminist merchandise!



Ask me anything



heroinfriday:


I saw Morgan was discussing The Mask You Live In earlier, here is a 4chan user’s response to the film, so while its a bit brash i think it touches on some interesting points in the second paragraph
Thoughts?

I enjoy this users take on the film and I think s/he summed it up quite well.
-Liv

heroinfriday:

I saw Morgan was discussing The Mask You Live In earlier, here is a 4chan user’s response to the film, so while its a bit brash i think it touches on some interesting points in the second paragraph

Thoughts?

I enjoy this users take on the film and I think s/he summed it up quite well.

-Liv

Reblogged 1 week ago from heroinfriday

poppypicklesticks:

lindor-truffle:

clothobuerocracy:

sickhypnotik:

you know how you say words so many times and they lose their meaning? that’s how I feel about the words “trauma” and “trigger” right now.

Putting this on the reg blog because it’s useful info

so.fucking.important.

I hope OP does one about headmates and multiple systems how it trivialises people with DiD and similar conditions 

Reblogged 1 week ago from nietzschesghost
nonchalant-fork:

Do you think he knows?

Ouroboros: an ancient symbol of eternal repetition. Who would’ve thought it looks this clumsy in reality?

nonchalant-fork:

Do you think he knows?

Ouroboros: an ancient symbol of eternal repetition. Who would’ve thought it looks this clumsy in reality?

(Source: ishmarics)

Reblogged 1 week ago from e-tank

INFP things #44

from-an-infp:

I don’t understand how people can be so apathetic about other peoples well being.

Two key phrases: Dunbar’s number and statistical numbing.

Reblogged 1 week ago from nethernox
musemorplsunerd:

brett-caton:

musemorplsunerd:

mr-cappadocia:

"Had sex with"
"She first slept with"
"would have regular intercourse"
"three counts of sexual intercourse"
A Nation run by Feminists… where a grown woman can fuck an eight year old boy repeatedly and the word “Rape” isn’t mentioned once.
Why? Because thanks to Feminists what she did isn’t considered rape.
And another Woman reaps the benefits of Feminist driven policy. Even if that means she can fuck/molest an eight year old boy repeatedly over the course of two years and get out a year after being sentenced.

After the boy was heard *bragging* about it at school. Rape is defined as unwanted if I’m not mistaken, perhaps when the boy was younger it was unwanted but that’s for the boy to choose. The reason she’s not being charged with sexual assault is because it wasn’t, not because of some bullshit feminist agenda or whatever. You are all so quick to leap to harking about feminism or corruption in the imbalance between males and females.

You say you see nothing wrong with having sex with 8 year old children. Why don’t you come out and tell that to your community - tell them if they have any little kiddies, you’d like to see see what they are like in bed.I mean, it’s not sexual assault if you seduce the child, by your reasoning - so they should have no problem with you doing this. I look forward to reading of your brutal treatment and subsequent lifelong paralysis.What you are saying is wrong. You know it is wrong. And yet, here you are, making excuses for it in the name of Feminism.Were I sitting in the jury of the person who bashed you to death after such an announcement, I do not think my judgement would be either difficult or unusual.

Ahem. Where to begin.
You are incorrect in assuming that I see nothing wrong with paedophilia. All I was pointing out was that the boy obviously consented to it, meaning the usage of the word rape would be confusing to common folk as tradtionally rape is used to describe unwanted sexual contact through force or duress.
If my eight year old son was having sex with someone of that age, then of course I would press charges and allow the court of law Its due process. You’ve completely misunderstood everything I said in that whole segment as you’re so floodlights focused on the lemming-esque hate on feminism.
You simpletons are so quick to jump to the use of brutal force when your words cannot suffice for the solution to assumed problems.

Wait, so you legitimately think an 8 years old boy is capable of giving consent to sex?

musemorplsunerd:

brett-caton:

musemorplsunerd:

mr-cappadocia:

"Had sex with"

"She first slept with"

"would have regular intercourse"

"three counts of sexual intercourse"

A Nation run by Feminists… where a grown woman can fuck an eight year old boy repeatedly and the word “Rape” isn’t mentioned once.

Why? Because thanks to Feminists what she did isn’t considered rape.

And another Woman reaps the benefits of Feminist driven policy. Even if that means she can fuck/molest an eight year old boy repeatedly over the course of two years and get out a year after being sentenced.

After the boy was heard *bragging* about it at school. Rape is defined as unwanted if I’m not mistaken, perhaps when the boy was younger it was unwanted but that’s for the boy to choose. The reason she’s not being charged with sexual assault is because it wasn’t, not because of some bullshit feminist agenda or whatever. You are all so quick to leap to harking about feminism or corruption in the imbalance between males and females.

You say you see nothing wrong with having sex with 8 year old children. Why don’t you come out and tell that to your community - tell them if they have any little kiddies, you’d like to see see what they are like in bed.


I mean, it’s not sexual assault if you seduce the child, by your reasoning - so they should have no problem with you doing this.

I look forward to reading of your brutal treatment and subsequent lifelong paralysis.

What you are saying is wrong. You know it is wrong. And yet, here you are, making excuses for it in the name of Feminism.

Were I sitting in the jury of the person who bashed you to death after such an announcement, I do not think my judgement would be either difficult or unusual.

Ahem. Where to begin.

You are incorrect in assuming that I see nothing wrong with paedophilia. All I was pointing out was that the boy obviously consented to it, meaning the usage of the word rape would be confusing to common folk as tradtionally rape is used to describe unwanted sexual contact through force or duress.

If my eight year old son was having sex with someone of that age, then of course I would press charges and allow the court of law Its due process. You’ve completely misunderstood everything I said in that whole segment as you’re so floodlights focused on the lemming-esque hate on feminism.

You simpletons are so quick to jump to the use of brutal force when your words cannot suffice for the solution to assumed problems.

Wait, so you legitimately think an 8 years old boy is capable of giving consent to sex?

Reblogged 1 week ago from musemorplsunerd

Anonymous asks: "No offense but what if the satanists are like.. twenty five and identify as a satanist?"

miss-andrea:

convertedinvader:

miss-andrea:

collowrath:

Adult “satanists” are even more embarrassing than teenage “satanists”.

there is literally no more direct way of exposing yourself as a mentally adolescent dickhead than just straight up inverting the values of your societies overarching moral system

the funny thing is that ‘humanist’ satanism and contemporary protestantism aren’t even that far removed from one another

You do realize that LaVeyan Satanism has jack shit to do with the generic concept of Satanism as a devil-worshipping cult, right? It isn’t fair, or even valid, to lump oh-so-edgy teenage “satanists” in with LaVeyans.

their devil worship may not be literal, but they’re still voluntarily associating themselves with the imagery and concept of the judeo-christian adversary, how this is any less childish, beyond the thin veneer of Respectable Secular Humanism, escapes me

How is meaningful symbolism childish to you?

Reblogged 1 week ago from miss-andrea

(Source: monkeearmada)

Reblogged 1 week ago from cramulus

Anonymous asks: "No offense but what if the satanists are like.. twenty five and identify as a satanist?"

miss-andrea:

collowrath:

Adult “satanists” are even more embarrassing than teenage “satanists”.

there is literally no more direct way of exposing yourself as a mentally adolescent dickhead than just straight up inverting the values of your societies overarching moral system

the funny thing is that ‘humanist’ satanism and contemporary protestantism aren’t even that far removed from one another

You do realize that LaVeyan Satanism has jack shit to do with the generic concept of Satanism as a devil-worshipping cult, right? It isn’t fair, or even valid, to lump oh-so-edgy teenage “satanists” in with LaVeyans.

Reblogged 1 week ago from miss-andrea

aboutwhitewomen:

<feminism/>

If you don’t know basic HTML, don’t try to be witty with it.

Reblogged 2 weeks ago from aboutwhitewomen

officialgavinfree:

oh my god i just realized what’s so dumb about people being like “why would you want to watch people play video games if you could just play them yourself” 

sports

you fucking idiots watch sports on the television shut the fuck up

What if I don’t get either? Both sports and games are things you should PLAY, not WATCH.

Reblogged 2 weeks ago from nietzschesghost